Ah, what I would give to write for
Jezebel. I loved
this article about the psychology of women through
Mad Men's 1965 lens. Seeing how things used to be for American women through the show feels simultaneously foreign and familiar; we note how much has changed for us by observing the female characters, and, at the same time, how much has stayed exactly the same. When the wives on the show dote on their husbands, like Trudi with Peter or Joanie with Greg, it seems exaggerated and demeaning, exhibiting how far women have come. But the sentiments of the women in the Ponds Cold Cream focus group in Sunday's episode were not far off from those in modern female psychology. Although the group members were asked about their beauty routines, the topic of conversation quickly turned to why they try to look attractive, and the answer was simple: to find a husband.
Yes, we've come a long way. Now women say, "we don't dress for men; we dress for other women." Is that entirely true, though? Maybe for fashion, but not so much for general attractiveness: grooming, exercising, eating right, etc. are big components in making ourselves appealing to the opposite sex. And whether or not we want to admit it, marriage, or at least relationships, remain pillars in mainstream female culture in ways they simply don't with male culture. If I had a dime for every time someone asked me if I had a boyfriend, and another for the follow-up - "why not?", or a more tactful version of that question - well, I'd be a very rich lady. I imagine guys my age are not asked that question as often (though I have not exactly taken a survey). Don's take on the issue was interesting; he disagreed that Ponds should take a matrimonial approach on its new campaign, arguing, "You can't tell how people are
going to behave based on how they
have behaved." This leads me to a chicken-or-the-egg sort of dilemma. Do popular culture and advertising inform women's behaviors (and people's, for that matter), or is it the other way around?